I came out of the latest
Star trek film feeling angry, and let down.
In a film set in a future
that is supposed to be pretty damn idealistic (great tech,
multicultural/multi-planetary teams, etc.) this film was behind the times NOW.
This film just felt like
one big "Male Gaze"
to the point where at times I felt physically pushed out of the moment of
enjoying a story by the horrible realisation this film wasn’t made for people
like me (that's 50% of the population BY THE WAY film industry). The concept of
a film so overtly made by men for men is problematic for several reasons,
sexual objectification being one, but my beef is that women have ZERO
independent character development; they are defined solely by their relation to
the male characters. Meanwhile male characters are given development both
within their romance and out of it.
Urgh, it turns out that it
is not space that is the final unexplored frontier, it is equality.
First up, in a meeting of
senior leaders –out of all the entire table of a variety of species discussing
plans, 5 women (mixed races and alien). A few characters are overtly alien.
There are Eleven
white humanoid men.
Really? In the future, we
STILL don’t have gender equality, or racial diversity? REALLY?
Uhura has always been a favourite
of mine, and I was looking forward to seeing her in this film. Unfortunately
she only had one token scene that didn’t revolve around her holding up the
concept of Spock's humanity. She bravely negotiated in perfect Klingon, and
appealed to the enemy’s' sense of honour to try and save her team. it didn’t
work, but it was a neat moment of one of the team showing their true colours
and value. Pity it was the only interesting thing she got to do.
The first scene to make me
realise that this movie was NOT going to make me happy, was the arrival of
Carol Marcus. A young female member of the team is introduced to her new
captain (and obviously, boss) – Kirk. On her arrival to the ship Kirk overtly
eyes her up and down, makes a loaded comment about how he is happy she is on
board, and proceeds to hit on her for the duration of the film.
So just to reiterate, a man
who is responsible for hundreds of lives in a workplace people have to LIVE at,
he feels confident enough in his own power, and consequently, her lack of
power, to sexually harass her within minutes of being introduced.
When I mentioned this to
people the overwhelming, and disappointing response was that the action was in
character with Kirk, who is to be honest, a bit of a knob. He is endearingly
reckless, thoughtless, and laddish. That’s what “makes” the film.
Talk about missing the
point.
Star trek is set in the
future. The future where I hope fervently the idea that workplace harassment
and the idea that any leader has the right to treat a staff member like they are
there for their enjoyment is ALSO not ok. JUST as silly as the idea of a man
"owning" a woman.
We don’t just stop having creeps
in this world, the entire culture around what those jerks are allowed to do to
other people changes. This is evidenced by all human rights changes ever.
In the future, all will be
equal, right? Star trek was the first show to have a woman of African descent
in a non –menial role*. It is SUPPOSED to take strides and be forward thinking
– the 1968 episode "Plato's Stepchildren" Uhura and Kirk kiss. The
episode is popularly cited as the first example of a scripted inter-racial kiss
on United States television.
This show is supposed to be
thoughtful, provocative, and philosophical.
I’m well aware that the show has been problematic before now, and will continue to need to improve, but to see that NO progress has been made in this latest film, is as much of a kick in the guts as finding this out was…
*how the actress herself was treated is more problematic – Nichols was the only performer in the cast who wasn't originally offered a contract, but instead worked on a week-to-week basis.